“Watchmen” As a Primer on Mental Disorder

WatchmenBloodySmiley

“Watchmen” has been a movie for some time now and a graphic novel for years before that, so I may be a little late to the party on this one, but I recently re-watched the film and it struck me that the characters aren’t just slightly crazy in unique or varied ways – they’re living embodiments of mental disorders – you can practically define each character by taking a page from the DSM IV and adding a dash of vigilantism and just enough exhibitionist tendency to wear a crazy costume and run around fighting whatever you happen to perceive as “crime.” Honestly the movie/novel combo should be required viewing/reading for first-year psych students. I’ll be honest here and say that I’m far from a psychologist (or even a psych major) but it was easy enough to spot the stereotype in Rorschach and Ozymandias, and it didn’t take a lot of research to find the archetypes for the rest. Shall we investigate?

First off, let me say that every character in this movie/novel has some kind of borderline or antisocial personality disorder, an overgrown ego and all the other symptoms you’d need to seriously believe that the best course of action for your life is to put on a costume, give yourself a cool nickname and patrol your local area fighting crime with all those superpowers that you (well, most of them anyway) don’t actually have. Remember: for the most part, these aren’t superheroes – no one sprouts claws or shoots lasers from their eyes. Well, Dr. Manhattan probably could, but he’s a weird exception-to-the-rule type character who’s completely insane in his own right. I’m not here to talk about the crazy these guys share, I’m here to talk about the crazy that sets them apart from one another.


Rorschach / Walter Kovacs
Paranoid Personality Disorder

Let’s begin with the most obviously mentally ill character. Walter has some deep-seated issues beginning in early life, creating an absolutely textbook case of Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD). PPD is characterized by “paranoia and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of others. Individuals with this personality disorder may be hypersensitive, easily feel slighted, and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases. Paranoid individuals are eager observers. They think they are in danger and look for signs and threats of that danger, potentially not appreciating other evidence.” If that doesn’t summarize Rorschach I don’t know what does.

In order to positively diagnose Rorschach, the ICD-10 requires at least three of the following:

  • Excessive sensitivity to setbacks and rebuffs.
  • Tendency to bear grudges persistently.
  • Suspiciousness and a pervasive tendency to distort experience by misconstruing neutral or friendly actions as hostile or contemptuous.
  • A combative and tenacious sense of personal rights out of keeping with the actual situation.
  • Recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding sexual fidelity of spouse or sexual partner.
  • Tendency to experience excessive self-importance, manifest in a persistent self-referential attitude.
  • Preoccupation with unsubstantiated conspiratorial explanations of events both immediate and in the wrld at large

The only bullet point Rorschach doesn’t hit is “suspicions … regarding sexual fidelity of spouse or sexual partner” and that’s basically because he doesn’t have one. Also, given his comments on all the fornicating going on in the city around him, I’m pretty sure he’s suspicious enough of the sexual fidelity of complete strangers to make up for that fact.

Ozymandias / Adrian Veidt
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Psychopathy 

Note: There has been some controversy over my “diagnosis” so I’m leaving it up to the audience: Narcissistic or Awesome?

Often referred to as “the most intelligent man in the world,” Ozymandias is one of the few characters in this story that might actually have a real superpower, as long as you consider profound genius to be a superpower. There’s no doubting he’s a brilliant guy, but if you find that, when describing yourself, you’re using the word “most” a lot, you might just have a touch of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). NPD is characterized by an excessive preoccupation with “issues of personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity.” If there is any question in your mind that Ozymandias is an NPD sufferer, just recall that prior to 1968 NPD had another name: “megalomania.” What makes Ozymandias the villain of the story is that, while many NPD sufferers have decreased empathy, Ozy’s lack of empathy borders on full-blown psychopathy: Ozymandias is what you get when you take a self-obsessed super genius and disconnect his ability to empathize with his fellow human beings.

In order to positively diagnose Ozymandias’ NPD, the DSM IV requires at least 5 of the following:

  • Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
  • Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
  • Believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
  • Requires excessive admiration
  • Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
  • Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
  • Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
  • Is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
  • Shows arrogant, haughty behavior or attitudes.

Again, Ozy not only fits the 5 needed bullet points, but seems to fit the entire list.

The Comedian / Edward Blake
Antisocial Personality Disorder

Called “The Comedian” for his seeming enjoyment in the grittier parts of a superhero’s job, Edward Black is almost certainly a sufferer of Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD). ASPD is characterized by “a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.” While APSD sufferers are often called “psychopaths” this is in the popular, not the clinical definition of the term. Psychopaths merely lack empathy – psychopathy by itself can still produce a reasonably functional member of society – it’s the co-occurrence of psychopathic traits with other disorders that’s created the popular use of the term. APSD is that selfish feeling that you’re more important than anyone else taken to the greatest of extremes.

The ICD-10 requires at least 3 of the following for an APSD diagnosis:

  • Callous unconcern for the feelings of others.
  • Gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social norms, rules, and obligations.
  • Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them.
  • Very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence.
  • Incapacity to experience guilt or to profit from experience, particularly punishment.
  • Markedly prone to blame others or to offer plausible rationalizations for the behavior that has brought the person into conflict with society.

While he did show the tiniest sliver of guilt after raping a team-mate, that’s one of the greatest violations of social code most of us can imagine, short of outright murder – which he also takes great joy in – and his level of guilt is hardly proportional to his offenses. The Comedian is a textbook APSD diagnosis, meeting or exceeding the requirements at every bullet point… Starting to see a pattern?

Nite Owl II / Daniel Dreiberg
Avoidant Personality Disorder

Here’s a guy with a freaking hovercraft parked in his garage. Here’s a guy with a badass costume decked out in all kinds of tech. This guy is practically Batman, but what does he do with it? He sits in his house and leads a sub-par less-than-adequate everyday life. He’s boring and most of his social interactions are incredibly stunted. Despite being one of the most powerful characters in this entire fictional world, Daniel lives in his own fictional world – one where he’s helpless and impotent. Avoidant Personality Disorder (AvPD) is characterized by “a pervasive pattern of social inhibition, feelings of inadequacy, extreme sensitivity to negative evaluation, and avoidance of social interaction.” AvPD sufferers imagine themselves to be inept, unappealing, unloved, unwanted or otherwise just not up to the challenges of life when in reality, they have no such deficits. In truth, AvPD sufferers spend so much time obsessing over their imagined poor performance that they’re often capable of stupendous performances in all the arenas they imagine themselves as low-functioning in – once they get past their stage fright.

The ICD-10 requires at least four of the following for an AvPD diagnosis:

  • Persistent and pervasive feelings of tension and apprehension;
  • Belief that one is socially inept, personally unappealing, or inferior to others;
  • Excessive preoccupation with being criticized or rejected in social situations;
  • Unwillingness to become involved with people unless certain of being liked;
  • Restrictions in lifestyle because of need to have physical security;
  • Avoidance of social or occupational activities that involve significant interpersonal contact because of fear of criticism, disapproval, or rejection.
  • Associated features may include hypersensitivity to rejection and criticism.

Again, every single bullet point. Laurie practically had to rape this guy to get him out of his shell and, unsurprisingly, once he came out of said shell, he was the closest thing to a proper superhero this plot ever saw. Speaking of Laurie…

Silk Spectre II / Laurie Juspeczyk
Histrionic Personality Disorder

Everyone who’s ever criticized movies, video games, comics or any other form of media for over-sexualizing women should be familiar with Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD). While it’s become the standard for how women should act in popular media, HPD does come with a pretty high degree of completely legitimate crazy. HPD is characterized by “a pattern of excessive emotionality and attention-seeking, including an excessive need for approval and inappropriately seductive behavior, usually beginning in early adulthood.” So basically when you see Hollywood interpreting women as incapable of controlling their emotions, overly sexual and desperate for attention what you’re really seeing is a dead-on portrayal of HPD. HPD sufferers also tend to be egocentric and manipulative – that’s Laurie all right.

The DSM-IV requires at least 5 of the following to diagnose HPD:

  • Uncomfortable in situations in which he or she is not the center of attention
  • Interaction with others is often characterized by inappropriate sexually seductive or provocative behavior
  • Displays rapidly shifting and shallow expression of emotions
  • Consistently uses physical appearance to draw attention to self
  • Has a style of speech that is excessively impressionistic and lacking in detail
  • Shows self-dramatization, theatricality, and exaggerated expression of emotion
  • Is suggestible, i.e., easily influenced by others or circumstances
  • Considers relationships to be more intimate than they actually are

Okay, in defense of Alan Moore (author of the original graphic novel) those sound like the traits of basically every female comic character – at least in 1986 when he was writing them. Once again, though, Moore kicks things up a notch by hitting every single point.

Doctor Manhattan / Jon Osterman
Schizoid Personality Disorder

You thought I was going to play the multiple personality angle perhaps? Y’know, because of the sex scene where he made copies of himself? Or maybe you thought I was going to go with some kind of God complex? Well that’s not really fair considering he is sort of a god… I mean, how well would you deal with that kind of power? Well, you’d probably develop Schizoid Personality Disorder (SPD). SPD is characterized by “lack of interest in social relationships, a tendency towards a solitary lifestyle, secretiveness, emotional coldness, and apathy.” This all makes sense, really. Imagine you’re Doctor Manhattan: You’re torn apart in a freak lab accident, then return as a crazy blue glowing dude who can see all possible outcomes of all possible events simultaneously. You can not only see forward and backward through time, but you can see and manipulate matter on a quantum level. You’re basically a god. From up there, we’ve all got to look like ants racing toward a volcano. All of this combined alienates Doctor Manhattan from humanity to the point that he can’t even be bothered to put on clothes – I mean if you’ve got a combined view of every event that could have happened, can happen and will happen, weaving and cutting some plant fibers to cover your nakedness just seems odd, doesn’t it?

The ICD-10 requires at least 4 of the following for an SPD diagnosis:

  • Emotional coldness, detachment or reduced affect.
  • Limited capacity to express either positive or negative emotions towards others.
  • Consistent preference for solitary activities.
  • Very few, if any, close friends or relationships, and a lack of desire for such.
  • Indifference to either praise or criticism.
  • Taking pleasure in few, if any, activities.
  • Indifference to social norms and conventions.
  • Preoccupation with fantasy and introspection.
  • Lack of desire for sexual experiences with another person.

Again, in Moore’s defense, this also sounds like a Vulcan and Star Trek had already existed for decades when this was written. Is it defensible that yet another one of Moore’s characters appears to have been directly lifted from a psychology textbook if it could have instead been based on another character that was lifted from the same textbook? I don’t really know, but as with so many things in life, Watchmen proved that comics are way more interesting when you put a bunch of crazies on both sides of a conflict.

In the end, I have to admit: While it’s great to understand the psychology behind the characters, this knowledge doesn’t really make the movie or knowledge that much better. Perhaps it’s a bit more rewarding to see Daniel overcome his personal problems when you see them in the light of a true blue mental disorder, or it adds a slightly more fleshed-out backstory to Laurie who would otherwise be a gratuitous female stereotype, but whether you knew they were disorders or not it still feels more enriching to watch imperfect people embrace their problems and become villains or struggle against their problems to become heroes. We admire comic book superheroes for their bravery and heroism, and Watchmen was one of the first to truly acknowledge that bravery and heroism are not a lack of fear and perfect moral compass: they’re the times when we win the struggle against the darker side of our own issues and imperfections, and for that reason it will always resonate with something at the core of the human experience.

Update: Some of the commenters on Hacker News have pointed out that I left out an important piece of information: All of the criteria I listed are just the criteria specific to the individual personality disorders. There is also a general set of 6 additional criteria that one must meet in order to actually be diagnosed with a personality disorder, regardless of which type. The one that keeps most of us from having a disorder, despite many of these being common traits, is “The enduring pattern leads to clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.” – most of us aren’t severely effected by these tendencies, but I’d say if any trait is leading you to a life of costumed vigilante crime fighting, you probably qualify.

Tip With Bitcoin

1JpgW8669RQky14owbAQ88VYBdeomxqbDL

Each post gets its own unique Bitcoin address so by tipping you're not only making my continued efforts possible but telling me what you liked. Vote with your (Bitcoin) wallet!

Comments

  1. To those debating Ozy's Narcissism: I'm taking it to an audience poll.

  2. pretty astute observation!

  3. Here's a question for you: Is any of this an accident? I wouldn't put Moore past having a copy of the DSM on his reference shelf. (Heck, I wouldn't put memorizing the thing past him.

    • I did touch on this a bit:

      "Is it defensible that yet another one of Moore's characters appears to have been directly lifted from a psychology textbook if it could have instead been based on another character that was lifted from the same textbook?"

      I don't necessarily think Moore yanked his character ideas from obscure psychological diagnostic material, I think it's more likely that he built from certain archetypes but went a bit over the top to emphasize exactly how nucking futs these guys were.

      • If you remember the points-based, advantages/disadvantages, superhero role playing game, Champions, there was an explanatory discussion somewhere about how a psychological disability that was very common and totally absorbing (which most characters had, because it was a good way to get points for your laser armpits or whatever) intrinsically meant the character was completely, clinically, insane.

        It fits.

  4. Good stuff, but I totally disagree with Ozymandias!

    >Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

    Uh, all of his achievements are 'commensurate' with his opinion of himself.

    >Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

    I don't think he's preoccupied with fantasies, he did what he wanted to do.

    >Requires excessive admiration

    Don't think so, he'd run for president or something instead.

    >Has a sense of entitlement,

    He gave up his money!

    >Is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her

    Doesn't apply.

    Basically, I think you can make an argument for Ozymandias being megalomaniacal, but I don't think the case is open shut. That's what makes his character fascinating, he's not a super villain, he actually wants to do the right thing but takes a philosophy (utilitarianism) to the extreme. He might not be crazy, he might have just made a really bad decision.

    • NPD *is* megalomania. The disorder was renamed in 1968, as mentioned in the article. Ozymandius is a unique narcissist in that he actually managed to live out his extreme opinion of himself, but a narcissist none the less. Also, he didn't really "give up" his money, he replaced it with a fortune he made for himself. Simply inheriting money didn't live up to his grandiose image of himself, it wasn't enough to be filthy rich, he had to be self-made rich.

  5. I saw a connection between Ozy's choosing of lesser evil and Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

    Which draws a clear line between Watchmen and government.

    "Who watches the watchmen?"

    In my opinion it requires megalomaniacs to make decisions for hundreds of millions of people.

    On the other hand, they might not even think that they know better than others, but just serve people in real power (money). That makes them psychopaths.

  6. It's now called a "personality disorder"? It used to be just called "personality".

    • Well, depending on how far back you're talking about going it would either be called "an ass" or "a madman" – one lost you friends the other got you locked up, lobotomized and electrocuted…

  7. Thanks Dave, enjoyed reading this and feel you did a good job overall.

    Perhaps the only snag (and I think it's a biggie) was the the classification of Ozymandias. Firstly I think NPD/Megalomania is an obvious choice, but in digging deeper I'm not sure this is the case.

    "Megalomania is characterized by an *inflated sense* of self-esteem and *overestimation* by persons of their powers and beliefs" (emphasis mine)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania

    The core issue boils down to one of "estimation". It appears (and I could be wrong) that Ozy was in fact relatively accurate in his claims and self-estimation. Yes, he is an outlier, and to most average Joe he had an enviable position of power and ability, yet I don't think it was fantastical or made up. He really deserved it as much as it might begrudge or annoy us to admit ;) Actually I got the sense from your writing style above, that you were really trying hard and *wanted* him to have this NPD classification. ("Not just 5 classifications, but Ozy actually fits the entire list!" Wow. case closed ;)

    Just because he didn't go around being humble, does not mean he didn't care about humanity (he did – albeit in a traditionally twisted way) or was a narcissist.

    Disclosure, my personality is close to Ozy's, hence my motivation for the defense of the critique. Sherlock Holmes is similar in many ways, albeit without the campy airyness (possibly gay) vibe that Ozymandias gave off.

    • This is a valid critique, and it's possible that actually being capable of near-god-like things might take narcissism off the table, that's fair. What's left then? He's clearly unhinged in one way or another. He clearly cares too much about humanity to be schizoid with Dr. Manhattan, borderline personality disorder is so non-specific it feels like a cop-out…

      I guess I can agree that narcissism is maybe not so correct, I've just never considered what it would mean to put the traits of that disorder on someone who is actually worthy of the monuments they're imagining.

      Like I said, I'm not even a psychology student, so this is just the result of my personal research and is by no means representative of professional-level skill or rigor.

      • Yeah realized that – as for Ozy not sure what's left. :) While passionate about analytic and evolutionary psychology, I have not really studied DSM or abnormal, albeit does seem like an interesting field.

        On a more lighthearted note, my favorite character is Manhattan:

        "I would only agree that a symbolic clock is as nourishing to the intellect as photograph of oxygen to a drowning man"

        Aloof, pedantic, brilliant. :D

        • The more I think about it, ozy might just be straight up clinical psychopathy. He definitely has decreased empathy at the very least. Perfect logic and complete detachment: the perfect utilitarian.

  8. This is the right chance to discuss one thing in the Watchmen comic – a sort of pet theory of mine which I am not sure is shared by many.

    ( ** Spoilers below, so if you haven't read the comic yet please skip this ** ).

    While I agree that Ozymandias is difficult to pinpoint as Narcissistic (considering that he is actually a paragon in all he does) there is one single panel that always nagged me and made me wonder if he is way less "superhuman" than he looks (and he thinks of himself).

    Specifically he states that when he first met The Comedian (and they were both much younger) they had a fight and Ozymandias "pretended" to be beaten by the other character. He makes it look like it was a deliberate decision to manipulate the Comedian. And we do, from the rest of the story, that decades later Ozymandias is obviously much better than Comedian, in a present-days fight.

    Well, but we always have only his word for it. Especially regarding letting the Comedian win in their first encounter.

    What if he was actually beaten, even if by accident, and part of his motives for his plot was to finally get revenge on the Comedian, and prove to every fellow hero he was really the best at everything? Including keeping Dr.Manhattan at bay admittedly not a mean feat… but oddly enough, the only one who could thwart his plans was… The Comedian, again.

    As supporting evidence I'd like to add that we never see an "objective" representation of how the fight at the start of the comic goes. We see a reconstruction by the police, and get some retelling from Ozymandias. What if he cheated? What if he used sleeping gas, a horde of ninjas, a taser…?

    We simply don't know. We do know that only one man ever get the best of him in a fight. This man was the Comedian, and now Ozymandias can just tell everyone that he allowed him to win for strategical reasons, and that the Comedian "accidentally" discovered his secret island base etc.

    Smells like a convenient post-facto rationalization, to me.

    (Note also that the Comedian is obviously loudmouthed, crass, vulgar and uncouth… can you imagine how insulting would be for Ozymandias having been beaten by the one he despised the most in the whole group?)

    • This is part of why it's so difficult to really pinpoint Ozymandias as a narcissist – If we take the comic stories as gospel truth then he really is living up to his self-image and we can't really apply that label, but this is a self-made uber-rich businessman. He has PR guys, he's rich, he's famous, he's a household name in this particular parallel universe and legends tend to spring up around people like that. It's never really specified if everything they say about Ozy is true or if he's buying into his own legend. It's equally difficult to say if his lost fight to The Comedian was genuine or if he's retconning it to be staged.

      Personally as someone who dabbles in both comics and information security, I find it difficult to swallow that "the most intelligent man in the world" would use "Rameses II" as his password, unless he explicitly wants it to be guessed and once again this comes down to an unanswered assumption: was he smart enough to know they'd guess that password and wanted them to or was it a mistake he retconned to protect his own ego?

      Ozy is a hard guy to pinpoint.

      • Michael Norwitz says:

        I don't have the comic in front of me, but I was under the impression that Ozy had approached the Comedian as an ally (at a time when Ozy was still young and naive) and the Comedian sucker-punched him. I don't think he claimed he had faked being beaten by the Comedian; rather, he had expressed his contempt for the Comedian's fighting technique and confidence that in any REAL fight, he would win … which is exactly what happend.

        That “Rameses II” passowrd thing has annoyed me since the first time I read it. Come on, the smartest man in the world can't memorise a long selection of random letters and digits?

        • Are we perhaps expecting too much from a comic book / graphic novel, or perhaps its author? Wouldn't it actually take the smartest man in the world to write the smartest man in the world?

          I don't know, there's a lot of inconsistency and omitted detail with the Ozymandias side of the story. For now I'm gonna stick to my guns and say he's a Narcissist – my impromptu poll is agreeing with that statement at least…

  9. dating disabled singles says:

    Hey there! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the outstanding work!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Source 2: http://codinginmysleep.com/watchmen-as-a-primer-on-mental-disorder/ [...]

  2. [...] character exhibits some characteristics of a medical disorder. This has already been examined in other articles so I will focus on two characters- Rorschach and Ozymandias, who both try to save the world, but [...]

Speak Your Mind

*

%d bloggers like this: